To prohibit the sale of certain inefficient light bulbs, and require the development of a plan for increasing the use of more efficient light bulbs by consumers and businesses.
previous 110th session of congress Other Bill Titles (1 more) 3/15/2007--Introduced.
Instructs the Secretary of Energy to issue regulations prohibiting the sale of light bulbs that emit less than:
(1) 60 lumens per watt, effective January 1, 2012;
(2) 90 lumens per watt, effective January 1, 2016; and
(3) 12... moreSee Full Bill Text
Sponsor
Committees
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Bill Status
| Introduced | ![]() | Voted on by House | ![]() | Voted on by Senate | ![]() | Considered By President | ![]() | Bill Becomes Law |
| March 15, 2007 |
In the News
We are not currently finding any news articles on this topic using our daily automated search of Google News. However, if you know of a relevant news article to display here, OpenCongress site editors have the ability to add it manually. Simply e-mail us the web address of this page and the web address of your suggested news article: We'll post relevant links as quickly as possible. Also, if this topic is important to you, you could write a letter to the editor -- if a news article refers this specific topic by name, a link to that news article is likely to appear here soon.
Blog Coverage
June 11, 2008 Stand Firm | Congress And Lightbulbs
The bill (HR 1547) was passed in December 2007, and an amendment to the bill (HR 5616) âThe Lightbulb Freedom of Choice Act") was introduced this March. The summary is here . At least someone in Congress has stopped a moment and said ...
Source: Stand Firm
February 26, 2008 High Efficiency Bulbs Come With A Risk
Image Courtesy of WorldNetDaily Early last year I wrote about HR 1547 which would prohibit the sale of certain inefficient light bulbs , at the time I said it was not a bright . . .
February 26, 2008 High Efficiency Bulbs Come With A Risk
Early last year I wrote about HR 1547 which would prohibit the sale of certain inefficient light bulbs, at the time I said it was not a bright idea. I emphasized the point that the alternative to incandescent bulbs would be fluorescent, ...
Source: Constitutionally Right










