Del.icio.us
Digg
StumbleUpon
Facebook
Reddit
Newsvine
co.mments
College Access and Opportunity Act of 2007
To amend and extend the Higher Education Act of 1965.
10/4/2007--Introduced.
College Access and Opportunity Act of 2007 - Amends the Higher Education Act of 1965 (HEA) to revise and reauthorize appropriations for HEA programs. Establishes a single definition of institutions of higher education (IHEs) for purposes of their participation in more...
Users Tracking [3]
Users who are tracking this bill are also tracking:
Committees
Amendments
This bill has no amendments.
Bill Status
| Introduced |  | Voted on by House | | Voted on by Senate | | Considered By President | | Bill Becomes Law |
| October 04, 2007 |
In the News
October 10, 2007 Congress Again Tries to Force Colleges to Curb Student Music and ...
The language is tucked away in the innocuously named College Access and Opportunity Act of 2007 (HR 3746), a measure that would amend and extend the Higher ...
Blog Coverage
March 07, 2008 Two more bills in Congress affecting a CERTAIN group of former sex ...
HR3746 Title: To amend and extend the Higher Education Act of 1965. Sponsor: Rep McKeon, Howard P. "Buck" [CA-25] (introduced 10/4/2007) Cosponsors (8) PART A--GRANTS TO STUDENTS SEC. 401. PELL GRANTS. ...
Source: Sex Offender Research by A Voice of Reason
Was this article useful?
Yes or
No
October 08, 2007 Some comments on Copyright and on Fair Use
Another recent development is a provision in the recently introduced âCollege Access and Opportunity Act of 2007â (HR 3746; use Thomas to find the text). Sec 484 (f) contains language that requires schools to put technology into place ...
Source: CERIAS Weblogs
Was this article useful?
Yes or
No
October 07, 2007 Hollywood, DRM, p2p, and higher education - what's wrong with this ...
In what is perhaps an even more long reaching piece of news this week there is language in the College Access and Opportunity Act of 2007 (HR 3746) that mandates specific actions by universities to act on behalf of the entertainment ...
Source: Oren Sreebny's Weblog
Was this article useful?
Yes or
No
3 more posts...
See highest rated blog posts
Information made available by:
Rating Filter: 5 (What's this?)(Close help)
Comments
(What's this?)(Close help)
<a href="http://wendy.seltzer.org/blog/archives/2007/11/13/new-bill-would-break-higher-education-networks.html">From my blog</a>:
Entertainment lobbyists have dumped a nasty trojan horse into this bill, with a requirement that educational institutions spend their scarce resources to
develop a plan for offering alternatives to illegal downloading or peer-to-peer distribution of intellectual property as well as a plan to explore technology-based deterrents to prevent such illegal activity.
So even as the committee asserts it wants to “make college more affordable and accessible,” it frustrates that purpose by letting Hollywood-driven mandates suck money away from the educational mission of colleges and universities. While “encourag[ing] colleges to rein in price increases,” the bill would force campuses to spend money exploring broken anti peer-to-peer technologies that make their networks less useful. Colleges that don’t fall into line risk losing federal student aid.
“Technology-based deterrents” are bound to be both over- and under-inclusive: blocking true educational uses while failing to stop piracy. A school cannot screen or filter all its Internet traffic without seriously impeding network innovation and research. If the “deterrents” block unknown communications, they stop students from experimenting on an end-to-end network, blocking the development of lawful peer-to-peer applications in the mold of Skype, distributed search, or LOCKSS (Lots of Copies Keep Stuff Safe), a library archival system. If they block encrypted traffic, they compromise privacy and security. If they don’t, they’re trivially circumvented.
Finally, there’s no automated way to determine whether “unauthorized” uses are fair. Even were a technology to have perfect access to all Internet traffic for comparison against a corpus of works, it would not be able to incorporate the judge necessary to determine whether a given use were fair, transformative, educational, or merely substitutive and unfair.
Half-baked ideas like these have no place in an education bill. Rather than forcing schools to spend scarce resources on entertainment companies’ agendas, Hollywood should do its own homework, offering students enough compelling, compatible alternatives that they choose authorized access.
The new numbers from the MPAA may help the cause of getting the p2p provision out of this bill:
"Yesterday, the Motion Picture Association of America admitted something that many of us had suspected all along – an MPAA-funded study showing that 44% of the industry’s losses came from illegal downloading of movies by college students using campus networks was overstated by a factor of 3. The MPAA now says that only 15% of its losses come from campus activity."
http://www.publicknowledge.org/node/1363
Moderated Comment
Add A Comment