The Library of Congress  >  THOMAS Home  >  Committee Reports  >  Search Results

69-010

2008
110th Congress 2d Session
SENATE
Report

110-469

Calendar No. 1028

INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES STEWARDSHIP AND ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 2008

R E P O R T

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION

on

S. 2907

congress.#13

SEPTEMBER 17, 2008- Ordered to be printed

SENATE COMMITTEE ON COMMERCE, SCIENCE, AND TRANSPORTATION
one hundred tenth congress
second session
DANIEL K. INOUYE, Hawaii, Chairman
JOHN D. ROCKEFELLER IV, West Virginia
JOHN F. KERRY, Massachusetts
BYRON L. DORGAN, North Dakota
BARBARA BOXER, California
BILL NELSON, Florida
MARIA CANTWELL, Washington
FRANK R. LAUTENBERG, New Jersey
MARK PRYOR, Arkansas
THOMAS CARPER, Delaware
CLAIRE MCCASKILL, Missouri
AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota
KAY BAILEY HUTCHISON, Texas
TED STEVENS, Alaska
JOHN MCCAIN, Arizona
OLYMPIA J. SNOWE, Maine
GORDON H. SMITH, Oregon
JOHN ENSIGN, Nevada
JOHN E. SUNUNU, New Hampshire
JIM DEMINT, South Carolina
DAVID VITTER, Louisiana
JOHN THUNE, South Dakota
ROGER F. WICKER, Mississippi
MARGARET CUMMISKY, STAFF DIRECTOR AND CHIEF COUNSEL
LILA HELMS, DEPUTY STAFF DIRECTOR AND POLICY DIRECTOR
JEAN TOAL EISEN, SENIOR ADVISOR AND DEPUTY POLICY DIRECTOR
CHRISTINE KURTH, REPUBLICAN STAFF DIRECTOR AND GENERAL COUNSEL
PAUL J. NAGLE, REPUBLICAN CHIEF COUNSEL
MIMI BRANIFF, REPUBLICAN DEPUTY CHIEF COUNSEL

Calendar No. 1028

110TH CONGRESS

Report

SENATE

2d Session

110-469

--INTERNATIONAL FISHERIES STEWARDSHIP AND ENFORCEMENT ACT OF 2008

SEPTEMBER 17, 2008- Ordered to be printed

Mr. INOUYE, from the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, submitted the following

REPORT

[To accompany S. 2907]

The Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, to which was referred the bill (S. 2907) to establish uniform administrative and enforcement procedures and penalties for the enforcement of the High Seas Driftnet Fishing Moritorium Protection Act and similar statutes, and for other purposes, having considered the same, reports favorably thereon with an amendment (in the nature of a substitute) and recommends that the bill (as amended) do pass.

PURPOSE OF THE BILL

BACKGROUND AND NEEDS

Foreign Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing

Unique IUU Challenges of Developing Countries

The Need for Legislation to Strengthen U.S. International Fisheries Enforcement

SUMMARY OF PROVISIONS

LEGISLATIVE HISTORY

ESTIMATED COSTS


July 25, 2008.

Hon. DANIEL K. INOUYE,
Chairman, Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation,
U.S. Senate, Washington, DC.

DEAR MR. CHAIRMAN: The Congressional Budget Office has prepared the enclosed cost estimate for S. 2907, the International Stewardship and Enforcement Act.

If you wish further details on this estimate, we will be pleased to provide them. The CBO staff contact is Deborah Reis.

Sincerely,

PETER R. ORSZAG.

Enclosure.

S. 2907--International Fisheries Stewardship and Enforcement Act

Summary: S. 2907 would establish uniform enforcement policies and procedures among federal statutes that govern the regulation of commercial fishing. The bill also would authorize funding for new programs to improve the enforcement of laws related to international fisheries and coordinate enforcement actions among federal agencies.

Assuming appropriation of the authorized amounts, CBO estimates that implementing S. 2907 would cost $90 million over the 2010-2013 period and $120 million after 2013. Enacting this legislation could increase revenues (from civil and criminal penalties) and associated direct spending, but CBO estimates that such increases would be less than $500,000 annually and would offset each other in most years.

Section 4 of the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA) excludes from the application of that act any legislative provisions that are necessary for the ratification or implementation of international treaty obligations. CBO has determined that the provisions of title IV fall within that exclusion because they would implement the Antigua Convention. Therefore, CBO has not reviewed title IV for the presence of intergovernmental or private-sector mandates.

The remaining provisions contain an intergovernmental and private-sector mandate as defined in UMRA because they would require public and private entities, if subpoenaed, to provide testimony, documents, or other evidence to the Department of Commerce. CBO estimates that the cost to comply with the mandate would fall below the annual thresholds established in UMRA for intergovernmental and private-sector mandates ($68 million and $136 million in 2008, respectively, adjusted annually for inflation).

Estimated cost to the Federal Government: The estimated budgetary impact of S. 2907 is shown in the following table. The costs of this legislation fall within budget function 300 (natural resources and environment).


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                             By fiscal year, in millions of dollars--                               
                                                                                 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2009-2013 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CHANGES IN SPENDING SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION                                                                        
Authorization Level                                                                 0   35   35   35   35       140 
Estimated Outlays                                                                   0   10   15   30   35        90 
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Basis of estimate: For this estimate, CBO assumes that the legislation will be enacted near the beginning of fiscal year 2009 and that the amounts authorized will be appropriated for each year. Estimated outlays are based on historical spending patterns for similar programs.

S. 2907 would authorize the appropriation of $30 million for each of fiscal years 2010 through 2015 for a new program to detect, investigate, and enforce laws against certain fishing activities. The new program would be administered by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and carried out with help from other federal agencies such as the U.S. Coast Guard and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The bill also would authorize the appropriation of $5 million annually over the same period for grants and other assistance to foreign governments to improve international enforcement of fisheries laws. Assuming appropriation of the authorized amounts, CBO estimates that implementing the new programs would cost $90 million over the 2010-2013 period and $120 million after 2013.

Finally, S. 2907 would increase civil and criminal penalties for violations of fisheries laws. Based on information provided by NOAA, CBO estimates that any increase in revenues from penalties would be less than $500,000 a year and would be offset by similar increases in direct spending from the Crime Victims Fund (for criminal penalties) or by NOAA (for civil penalties) as authorized by existing law.

Intergovernmental and private-sector impact: Section 4 of UMRA excludes from the application of that act any legislative provisions that are necessary for the ratification or implementation of international treaty obligations. CBO has determined that the provisions of title IV fall within that exclusion because they would implement the Antigua Convention. Therefore, CBO has not reviewed title IV for the presence of intergovernmental or private-sector mandates.

The remaining provisions contain an intergovernmental and private-sector mandate as defined in UMRA. The bill would expand the authority of the Secretary of Commerce to issue subpoenas when investigating violations of certain fishing laws. Public and private entities, if subpoenaed, would be required to provide testimony, documents, or other evidence. CBO expects that the Secretary would use that authority sparingly and that the costs to the private and public entities to comply with such subpoenas would be small. Therefore CBO estimates that the cost of the mandate would fall below the annual thresholds established in UMRA for intergovernmental and private-sector mandates ($68 million and $136 million in 2008, respectively, adjusted annually for inflation).

Estimate prepared by: Federal Costs: Deborah Reis; Impact on State, Local, and Tribal Governments: Elizabeth Cove; Impact on the Private Sector: Jacob Kuiper.

Estimate approved by: Theresa Gullo, Deputy Assistant Director for Budget Analysis.

REGULATORY IMPACT STATEMENT

NUMBER OF PERSONS COVERED

ECONOMIC IMPACT

PRIVACY

PAPERWORK

CONGRESSIONALLY DIRECTED SPENDING

SECTION-BY-SECTION ANALYSIS

Section 1. Short Title and Table of Contents.

TITLE I. ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF CERTAIN FISHERY AND RELATED STATUTES

Section 101. Authority of the Secretary to Enforce Statutes.

Section 102. Conforming, Minor, and Technical Amendments.

Section 103. Illegal, Unreported, or Unregulated Fishing.

TITLE II. LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS

Section 201. International Fisheries Enforcement Program.

Section 202. International Cooperation and Assistance Program.

TITLE III. MISCELLANEOUS AMENDMENTS

Section 301. Atlantic Tunas Convention Act of 1975.

Section 302. Data Sharing.

Section 303. Permits Under the High Seas Fishing Compliance Act of 1995.

Section 304. Technical Corrections to the Western and Central Pacific Fisheries Convention Implementation Act.

Section 305. Technical Correction to the Pacific Whiting Act of 2006.

Section 306. Committee on Scientific Cooperation for Pacific Salmon Agreement.

Section 307. Reauthorizations.

TITLE IV. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ANTIGUA CONVENTION

Section 401. Short Title.

Section 402. Amendment of the Tuna Conventions Act of 1950.

Section 403. Definitions.

Section 404. Commissioners; Number, Appointment, and Qualifications.

Section 405. General Advisory Committee and Scientific Advisory Subcommittee.

Section 406. Rulemaking.

Section 407. Prohibited Acts.

Section 408. Enforcement.

Section 409. Reduction of Bycatch.

Section 410. Repeal of Eastern Pacific Tuna Licensing Act of 1984

CHANGES IN EXISTING LAW

NORTHERN PACIFIC HALIBUT ACT OF 1982

SEC. 7. PROHIBITED ACTS.

[16 U.S.C. 773e]

5SEC. 3. CIVIL PENATLY; PROCEDURE.

[16 U.S.C. 773f]

5SEC. 9. CRIMES AND CRIMINAL PENALTIES.

[16 U.S.C. 773g]

5SEC. 10. FORFEITURES.

[16 U.S.C. 773h]

SEC. 11. ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCMENT.

[16 U.S.C. 773i]

TUNA CONVENTIONS ACT OF 1950

5SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

[16 U.S.C. 951]

SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

5SEC. 3. COMMISSIONERS; NUMBER; APPOINTMENT; QUALIFICATION.

[16 U.S.C. 952]

SEC. 3. COMMISSIONERS.

SEC. 4. GENERAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND SCIENTIFIC ADVISORY SUBCOMMITTEE.

[16 U.S.C. 953]

5SEC. 6. SECRETARY OF STATE TO ACT FOR UNITED STATES.6

SEC. 6. RULEMAKING.

[16 U.S.C. 955]

5SEC. 8. VIOLATIONS; FINES AND FORFEITURES; APPLICATION OF RELATED LAWS.

[16 U.S.C. 957]

SEC. 8. PROHIBITED ACTS.

5SEC. 10. ENFORCEMENT.

[16 U.S.C. 959]

SEC. 10. ENFORCEMENT.

SEC. 15. REDUCTION OF BYCATCH IN THE EASTERN TROPICAL PACIFIC OCEAN.

[16 U.S.C. 962]

ATLANTIC TUNAS CONVENTION ACT OF 1975

SEC. 6. ADMINISTRATION.

[16 U.S.C. 971d]

SEC. 7. VIOLATIONS; FINES AND FORFEITURES; RELATED LAWS.

[16 U.S.C. 971e]

SEC. 8. ENFORCEMENT.

[16 U.S.C. 971f]

5SEC. 11. ANNUAL REPORT.

[16 U.S.C. 971j]

5EASTERN PACIFIC TUNA LICENSING ACT OF 1984

5SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

5SEC. 2. DEFINITIONS.

[16 U.S.C. 972]