• Filtered Comment [show]

  How helpful was this comment for you? Use the slider bar to rate it 1-10, with 10 being very helpful and 1 being least helpful.

  by lerichards |

  Mar 01, 2008(7 months ago) |

  Link |

  Reply |

  Overall Rating: 5.0 |

  Login to Rate

  
  
  To whom it may concern:
  I will not weary you in a lot of vague ideas and experiences, for they will offer nothing to give
  action toward your investigating the area of my concern. My concern is coming from above,
  namely Space Satellites. The Federal Government has placed in space, for National Security
  reasons Space Stations to observe areas of our great country, thinking that our enemies may
  attack us. Of course, some individuals within the Government, citizens too, believe any and all
  means are necessary to protect and defend the citizens of this Great Nation, and I agree. The thing
  is, these Satellites can and are being used for seeking out and disrupting citizens from their normal
  everyday activities. Satellite technology doing harm to citizens is a dastardly thing within any
  country when their technology becomes the controlling factor to those citizens living “the pursuit
  of happiness” dream.
  For me to comprehend its existence, Satellite Technology and its usage is as mysterious as
  its ramifications on my life. The continuous effect of The Satellite Program has advanced my
  interest; otherwise, I would have never become involved. The effects of Satellite bombardment
  are unbroken in any and all my endeavors. The Satellite program has totally surrounded me,
  controlling me, consequentially forging me outside my normal existence.
  It is difficult to describe the effects and harm the U S Government is doing to my body.
  My toenail has a tear; toes are discolored, small reddest mark on different part of my body. Laser
  is being used more of late, due to it’s effectiveness in penetrating my surround barriers. There is
  no end to the torturing I’m suffering. To say the least, I need something done, an immediately.
  I’m hoping you may help me in this distressing matter.
  As I understand, nearly a year of constant surveillance and harmful penetration, satellites
  are operated by using a ground coordinator. A person who physically monitors, making contact
  with me, following me by vehicle or coming close to my approxime while in stores, etc. The
  spying while in my home is done with equipment in neighboring homes, surveillance of my every
  move 24 hours a day.
  Sincerely, Lawrence E Richards 352-585-5466
  7272 Landsdale St.
  Brooksville, Fl. 34601
  law_richards@yahoo.com
  

• Filtered Comment [show]

  How helpful was this comment for you? Use the slider bar to rate it 1-10, with 10 being very helpful and 1 being least helpful.

  by Anonymous |

  Sep 20, 2008(20 days ago) |

  Link |

  Reply |

  Overall Rating: 5.0 |

  Login to Rate

  I understand that Ryan's bill is coming to a vote, I hope you are aware that Ryan was a known drug abuser. How could congress put his name on a bill? Please check his web page... it is a known fact...This must be a sad day for all America that's like putting Colombia's drug leader on a bill. Shame on congress, as a pain patient this is not right....I'm sad that you would help pass this bill. This is why we are in a financial crisis now, NO cares to do any research

• Filtered Comment [show]

  How helpful was this comment for you? Use the slider bar to rate it 1-10, with 10 being very helpful and 1 being least helpful.

  by Anonymous |

  Sep 20, 2008(20 days ago) |

  Link |

  Reply |

  Overall Rating: 5.0 |

  Login to Rate

  I understand that Ryan's bill is coming to a vote, I hope you are aware that Ryan was a known drug abuser. How could congress put his name on a bill? Please check his web page... it is a known fact...This must be a sad day for all America that's like putting Colombia's drug leader on a bill. Shame on congress, as a pain patient this is not right....I'm sad that you would help pass this bill. This is why we are in a financial crisis now, NOONE CARES TO DO any research

• Filtered Comment [show]

  How helpful was this comment for you? Use the slider bar to rate it 1-10, with 10 being very helpful and 1 being least helpful.

  by Anonymous |

  Sep 21, 2008(19 days ago) |

  Link |

  Reply |

  Overall Rating: 5.0 |

  Login to Rate

  i think he went from the top down when he should have went from the bottom up. instead of bailing out the mortgage lenders he should have helped the HOMEOWNERS pay their mortgages then the lenders would have their money AND people would have their houses too.the way he did it people will still lose their homes but the TAXPAYERS AND THE BORROWER pay for the home and get nothing.he could have done it so all 3 partys(taxpayers,homeowners,lenders) won but he did not.if he can give the lenders 800 billion and spend all the billions he does on foriegn matters then why couldn't he start a temporary "walfare like" program to save american homeowners? the homeowners would get the money to save their houses,the banks would get their payments and he could add the "loaned walfare" house payment money on to their property in the form of a lien so the taxpayer loses nothing. the people keep their house ,the banks get their money AND since the homeowner eventually pays the money back the taxpayers are not out 800 billion. NO ONE LOSSES.the way he is doing it ALL the taxpayers (including the former homeowner) are paying for the house through his 800 billion payment but no one gets the house,(unless you count the slick dude who bought the $150.000 house for $10.000 at the sheriffs auction).either way it's costing taxpayers AND homeowners when it doesn't have to cost ANYBODY.say your mortgage was $1000 a month,you need help for a year thats $12000 .now instead of upping your payment(which i hear is why a lot of people are folding,ARM'S)or helping the bank make more interest off your existing loan you just lien the property.if you did it by adding it through your existing mortgage of 15 years your payment and interest would probably be substantial, at least your payment would rise and thats what you would want to avoid .so i think it should have been a "HOMEOWNERS BAILOUT" not a "LENDERS BAILOUT".plus with their homes safe they could quit worring about the mortgage and pay other bills and buy things thus stimulating the economy .thats $12,000 thats put back into the economy that didn't cost taxpayers ANYTHING,far better then the $300 "tax rebate" that cost the goverment money and did not stimulate anything. if you were lucky it helped you catch up on your $500 a month winter heating bill from last year.plus the home owner still has to pay back the money even though he lost his house!! i wonder what the motgage company will do with that money. remember, if i owe $100,000 on my mortgage and they sell my house for $10,000 i still have to pay back the bank the $90,000 difference.WTF? so once again the average working man gets shafted but big business does not.while i do not mean it badly (we are capitalist's)the only one thats making out is the guy who bought your house for $10,000 while you have to pay the whole $100,000.almost sounds like alimoney, you have to pay for the horse someone else gets to ride.so since its taxpayer money why are they not bailing out the taxpayer instead of the lenders?$12,000 average per homeowner is not a lot when you consider 1)the owner does not lose the house.2)the bank gets their payment and does not go under.(also giving them more to loan stimulateing the economy even further)3)the loan is secured through property.4)the economy gets stimulated big time by the extra consumer money.5)taxpayers lose nothing.every bodys happy all the way around

Add A Comment

Please Login or Signup, unless you wish to post anonymously
Comment :
Spam check :	(type the code from the image)
	OpenCongress comment boards are an open forum for discussion, so please do not post any information here that you do not wish to be public.